Last updated: October 2026
What to check, in order, when a topography or tomography report lands on your desk: is this keratoconus (or a suspect), how severe is it, is it progressing, and is the cornea safe for refractive surgery?
| Index | Suspect | Keratoconus |
|---|---|---|
| Central K | Over 47.2 D | Over 48.7 D |
| I–S value (inferior minus superior power, 3 mm) | Over 1.4 D | Over 1.9 D |
| Inter-eye central K difference | Over 1.0 D | |
| SRAX (skew of the radial axes) | Over 21° | |
| KISA% (combines K, I–S, astigmatism and SRAX) | 60–100% | Over 100% |
Rabinowitz-McDonnell criteria. Placido indices miss early posterior-surface disease, so always look at tomography when available.
| Parameter | Normal | Suspicious | Abnormal |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAD-D (Belin-Ambrósio final D) | Under 1.6 | 1.6–2.6 | 2.6 or more |
| Anterior elevation at the thinnest point (8 mm best-fit sphere) | Under +12 µm | +12 to +15 µm | Over +15 µm |
| Posterior elevation at the thinnest point (8 mm best-fit sphere) | Under +17 µm | +17 to +20 µm | Over +20 µm |
| Thinnest pachymetry | Over 500 µm | 470–500 µm | Under 470 µm (interpret with the pattern) |
| Inter-eye thinnest-point difference | Under 30 µm | 30 µm or more | |
| Thinnest point location | Displaced inferotemporally away from the apex, with a rapid "fall-off" of the pachymetry progression curve, is suspicious | ||
Device note: these cut-offs are for Pentacam-style Scheimpflug systems. Galilei, Sirius, MS-39 and swept-source OCT tomographers use their own indices and normative databases, so do not transfer numbers between machines. The BAD-D grey zone also depends on age: a borderline value is more worrying at 20 than at 55.
| Stage | A: anterior radius (3 mm zone) | B: posterior radius (3 mm zone) | C: thinnest pachymetry | D: best distance VA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Over 7.25 mm (under 46.5 D) | Over 5.90 mm | Over 490 µm | 20/20 or better |
| I | Over 7.05 mm (under 48.0 D) | Over 5.70 mm | Over 450 µm | Worse than 20/20 |
| II | Over 6.35 mm (under 53.0 D) | Over 5.15 mm | Over 400 µm | Worse than 20/40 |
| III | Over 6.15 mm (under 55.0 D) | Over 4.95 mm | Over 300 µm | Worse than 20/100 |
| IV | Under 6.15 mm (over 55.0 D) | Under 4.95 mm | 300 µm or less | Worse than 20/400 |
Each parameter is staged separately (for example A2 B3 C1 D1), with a suffix for scarring.
| Check | Safer | Caution or avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Residual stromal bed (LASIK) | 300 µm or more | Under 250–300 µm |
| Percent tissue altered: (flap + ablation) ÷ preoperative CCT | Under 40% | 40% or more (high ectasia risk) |
| Tomography | Normal in both eyes | Any suspicious BAD-D, elevation or pachymetry pattern: avoid LASIK; consider surface ablation only with great care, or phakic IOL |
| Epithelial thickness map (if available) | Even epithelium | Epithelial thinning over a steep area with a surrounding "doughnut" of thicker epithelium suggests early ectasia |
Red flags on any report: inferior steepening with a skewed bowtie, posterior elevation over +20 µm, a thinnest point under 470 µm or far from the apex, inter-eye asymmetry, or a young patient with a rising cylinder. Repeat the scan, then decide.
Related: how to read topography and tomography (detailed tips), keratoconus notes and refractive surgery for residents.
📘 Want more exam-ready material? See Most Commons in Ophthalmology on Kindle, or browse all my books.
Looking for an eye specialist in Ahmedabad? Read about corneal topography at Sadbhaav or book a consultation with Dr. Dhaval Patel.