Last updated: October 2026

Decision tree: Acute angle closure attack
A one-page, printable step-by-step flowchart for the emergency room or OPD.
The ISGEO (International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology) classification remains the standard framework for staging angle closure disease — precise terminology here matters because it directly determines management.
| Term | Gonioscopy | Other findings |
|---|---|---|
| Primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) | Posterior trabecular meshwork iridotrabecular contact (ITC) in three or more quadrants, but no peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) | Normal IOP, optic disc, and visual field. A lower threshold — even two quadrants of ITC, or a narrow angle approach of ~20° — may still justify the diagnosis in some patients showing evidence of intermittent angle closure |
| Primary angle-closure (PAC) | Three or more quadrants of ITC, with raised IOP and/or PAS, or excessive pigment smudging on the trabecular meshwork | Normal optic disc and visual field — the key distinction from PACG is the absence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy |
| Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) | ITC in three or more quadrants | Glaucomatous optic neuropathy present — this is what separates PACG from PAC |
While gonioscopy remains the clinical reference standard for angle assessment, anterior segment OCT is now widely used as a complementary, non-contact tool — particularly useful for objective, reproducible angle measurements and for patients where gonioscopy is difficult (photophobia, corneal haze, or poor cooperation).
Randomized trial evidence (including the EAGLE trial) has shown that in select patients — people aged 50 or older with primary angle closure and IOP of 30 mmHg or more, or with PACG (acute attacks were excluded) — clear lens extraction can outperform laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) as an initial treatment, by permanently deepening the anterior chamber rather than simply creating a pressure-equalizing bypass. This has meaningfully shifted first-line thinking in some angle-closure scenarios, especially when a visually significant cataract already coexists — worth knowing as current evidence-based practice rather than defaulting reflexively to "LPI for everyone."
| Trial | Finding | Practice point |
|---|---|---|
| ZAP (2019, China) | Prophylactic iridotomy in one eye of PACS patients: progression to PAC was low (about 4 vs 8 per 1000 eye-years, under 1% a year), so the absolute benefit was small | Laser iridotomy is not routine for PACS; consider it for higher risk (narrow angles needing dilation, poor access to care, symptoms) |
| ANA-LIG (Singapore) | Similar low progression rates after iridotomy in PACS | Supports a selective approach |
| EAGLE (2016) | Clear lens extraction beat iridotomy for PAC with IOP ≥30 mmHg or PACG | Consider lensectomy early in PAC/PACG |
| Terminology | PACS is now iridotrabecular contact of 180° or more (was 270°) | See ISGEO in the classifications page |
Sources for this update: He M, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure (ZAP). Lancet. 2019;393:1609-1618 | Azuara-Blanco A, et al. Clear-lens extraction versus laser iridotomy (EAGLE). Lancet. 2016;388:1389-1397.
Key references: Weinreb RN, et al. Primary angle-closure disease: ISGEO classification. | Day AC, et al. EAGLE trial: clear lens extraction for primary angle closure glaucoma. Lancet.
📘 Want the exam-ready deep dive? This topic is covered in iNotes 2027: Glaucoma (Ophthalmology Postgraduate Exam Notes) — available on Kindle. See all my books.
Want to know more about treatment? Read about Glaucoma Treatment at Sadbhaav or book a consultation with Dr. Dhaval Patel.