Last updated: October 2026
Diabetic retinopathy is the condition you will grade, treat and counsel for more than almost any other. This page gives you the classification, the exact definitions examiners expect, and a modern treatment framework based on the landmark trials.
| Grade | Findings |
|---|---|
| No apparent retinopathy | No abnormalities |
| Mild NPDR | Microaneurysms only |
| Moderate NPDR | More than microaneurysms, but less than severe NPDR |
| Severe NPDR | Any one of the 4-2-1 rule, with no signs of PDR |
| PDR | Neovascularisation (disc or elsewhere) and/or vitreous or preretinal haemorrhage |
Two or more of these features makes it "very severe" NPDR. These eyes carry a high risk of progressing to PDR within a year, so follow them closely.
Eyes with high-risk characteristics need prompt treatment. See landmark trials for DRS and ETDRS.
| Situation | Usual approach |
|---|---|
| Centre-involving DME with reduced vision | Anti-VEGF injections first line (Protocol T). Consider a steroid implant in pseudophakic eyes, poor responders, or when frequent visits are impossible. |
| Centre-involving DME with good vision (20/25 or better) | Close observation is reasonable, treating if vision drops (Protocol V). |
| Non-centre-involving DME | Observe, or focal laser to leaking microaneurysms threatening the centre. |
| Severe NPDR | Close follow-up. Consider early PRP in type 2 diabetes, poor compliance, or before cataract surgery. |
| PDR | PRP or anti-VEGF (Protocol S). PRP is safer when follow-up is uncertain, because anti-VEGF alone needs regular injections. |
| Non-clearing vitreous haemorrhage, tractional detachment threatening the macula | Vitrectomy, often with pre-operative anti-VEGF to reduce bleeding. |
| Topic | What to know |
|---|---|
| Faricimab | VEGF-A plus angiopoietin-2 inhibitor; YOSEMITE and RHINE showed vision gains equal to aflibercept with up to 16-weekly dosing in DME |
| Aflibercept 8 mg | PHOTON: non-inferior to 2 mg with dosing every 12–16 weeks in DME |
| Protocol W | Anti-VEGF for severe NPDR without DME reduced progression to PDR or centre-involving DME, but gave no visual benefit at 4 years: observation with close follow-up remains reasonable |
| Protocol S and CLARITY | Anti-VEGF is an alternative to PRP for PDR if follow-up is reliable; PRP is safer for patients likely to be lost to follow-up |
| Protocol V | Centre-involving DME with good vision (6/7.5 or better): observation, laser or aflibercept gave similar outcomes at 2 years |
| Fenofibrate | LENS (2024) and FIELD/ACCORD-Eye: fenofibrate slows progression of retinopathy; consider with the physician |
| Rapid glucose lowering | Big HbA1c falls (including with semaglutide or after bariatric surgery) can cause early worsening; examine before and after |
Sources for this update: Wykoff CC, et al. Faricimab for DME (YOSEMITE and RHINE). Lancet. 2022;399:741-755 | Maturi RK, et al. Four-year outcomes of aflibercept vs sham for severe NPDR (Protocol W). JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141:348-357 | Preiss D, et al. Fenofibrate and progression of diabetic retinopathy (LENS). NEJM Evid. 2024.
Quick reference: Screening schedules card. More one-screen cards in the Clinic Desk Reference.
📘 Want more exam-ready material? See Most Commons in Ophthalmology on Kindle, or browse all my books.
Looking for an eye specialist in Ahmedabad? Read about diabetic retinopathy treatment at Sadbhaav or book a consultation with Dr. Dhaval Patel.