Last updated: October 2026
Short answer: an IOL placed in the ciliary sulcus sits further forward than one in the capsular bag, so it acts more strongly. You therefore reduce the IOL power, typically by 0.5 D for lower powers and 1 D or more for higher powers. If you can capture the optic through an intact capsulorhexis, use the in-the-bag power instead.
A commonly cited approach, based on a study summarised by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, adjusts the reduction by the predicted in-the-bag power:
| Predicted in-the-bag IOL power | Suggested reduction for sulcus placement |
|---|---|
| Below 18 D | 0.5 D |
| 18 to 25 D | At least 1 D |
| Above 25 D | 1.5 to 2 D |
Higher-power lenses (shorter eyes) are more sensitive to a change in position, which is why they need a larger reduction. Short eyes (below about 22 mm) also showed larger refractive errors.
A sulcus lens sits more anteriorly than an in-the-bag lens, which increases its effective power. Without a reduction, the patient would end up more myopic than planned.
No. If the optic is captured through an intact anterior capsulorhexis, it sits close to the in-the-bag position, so the in-the-bag power is used.
It is best avoided. Its thick haptics can chafe the iris and cause pigment dispersion, raised pressure, inflammation and bleeding. Use a three-piece IOL designed for the sulcus.
Related: PCR management flowchart, biometry rules of thumb and IOL calculators.
📘 Want more exam-ready material? See iNotes 2027: Lens on Kindle, or browse all my books.
Looking for an eye specialist in Ahmedabad? Read about cataract surgery at Sadbhaav or book a consultation with Dr. Dhaval Patel.