Last updated: October 2026
A visual field printout contains everything you need to make a correct decision, if you read it in the right order. These are practical rules for reading Humphrey-style fields, spotting artifacts, and recognising glaucoma and neurological patterns.
The one-line rule: read the greyscale last. It is the most eye-catching part of the printout and the most misleading.
The reading order
- Patient details: name, eye, date of birth (age sets the normal values), date of test.
- Test details: programme (24-2, 30-2, 10-2, 24-2C), strategy (SITA Standard, Fast, Faster), stimulus size (usually III), pupil size, and the corrective lens used.
- Reliability indices and the gaze tracker.
- Total deviation and pattern deviation probability plots.
- Global indices: GHT, MD, PSD, VFI.
- Greyscale, only as a quick visual summary.
Reliability: is this field worth reading?
- False positives above about 15% (SITA) make the field unreliable. Signs of a "trigger-happy" patient: white areas on the greyscale, impossibly high thresholds, and a positive MD that looks too good.
- Fixation losses above about 20% (blind-spot method) are a warning, but the blind spot method can be wrong if it was mapped incorrectly. The gaze tracker trace at the bottom is a better guide: a mostly flat line with few spikes is good.
- False negatives are often high in fields with real damage, so a high false-negative rate does not automatically mean poor reliability. It does mean you should be careful.
- The first field is often worse than later ones because of the learning effect. Never diagnose glaucoma from a single field; repeat it.
Total deviation vs pattern deviation
- Total deviation compares every point with age-matched normals.
- Pattern deviation removes any general depression and shows localised loss.
- Total deviation abnormal everywhere, pattern deviation normal = generalised depression: cataract, small pupil, uncorrected refractive error, or media opacity.
- Pattern deviation abnormal in a cluster = localised defect, the pattern that suggests glaucoma or a neurological cause.
- In very advanced glaucoma, pattern deviation can underestimate damage. Use total deviation and the raw thresholds.
Global indices
- GHT (Glaucoma Hemifield Test): compares matching zones above and below the horizontal meridian. "Outside normal limits" is one of the most useful signs of glaucomatous loss.
- MD (mean deviation): overall depression, strongly affected by cataract.
- PSD (pattern standard deviation): irregularity of the field, a good marker of localised loss. It paradoxically falls again in end-stage disease, when the whole field is depressed.
- VFI (visual field index): percentage of normal visual function, weighted towards the centre and less affected by cataract than MD.
Artifacts and mimics
- Lens rim artifact: a ring of depressed points at the edge of the test area, caused by the trial lens rim. Centre the lens close to the eye.
- Ptosis and heavy brows: superior depression. Tape the lid and repeat.
- Wrong correction: an uncorrected refractive error depresses the whole field. Use the correct age-appropriate near addition.
- Small pupil: pupils under about 3 mm reduce sensitivity. Dilate and repeat if needed.
- Fatigue: a "cloverleaf" pattern of better points around the four starting locations means the patient tired as the test went on.
- High myopia and tilted discs: enlarged blind spots and superotemporal defects that do not respect the vertical meridian, and can mimic glaucoma or chiasmal defects.
Glaucoma patterns
- Glaucomatous defects follow the nerve fibre layer and respect the horizontal meridian: nasal step, paracentral scotoma, arcuate (Bjerrum) defect, and later a residual central or temporal island.
- Match the field to the disc. Inferior rim thinning should produce a superior field defect, and vice versa.
- Central 10° is under-sampled: a 24-2 has only a few points in the central 10°. Patients with paracentral defects, NTG, or advanced disease need a 10-2 (or a 24-2C) to see what is happening near fixation.
- Minimum criteria for glaucomatous field loss (Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson): GHT outside normal limits, or PSD with p < 5%, or a cluster of at least 3 contiguous non-edge points at p < 5% on the pattern deviation plot in one hemifield, with at least one at p < 1%. Confirm on two consecutive reliable fields.
- Staging (Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson, by MD): early above −6 dB, moderate −6 to −12 dB, severe below −12 dB, with additional criteria for points near fixation.
Neurological patterns
- Defects that respect the vertical meridian mean chiasmal or retrochiasmal disease until proven otherwise.
- Bitemporal hemianopia: chiasmal compression (pituitary tumour). Superior defects first suggest compression from below.
- Junctional scotoma: a central scotoma in one eye plus a superotemporal defect in the other eye localises to the junction of the optic nerve and chiasm.
- Homonymous defects: the more posterior the lesion, the more congruous the defect. Macular sparing suggests an occipital cause. A superior "pie in the sky" defect suggests a temporal lobe lesion.
- Central and centrocaecal scotomas: optic neuritis, toxic or nutritional neuropathy, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy.
- Enlarged blind spot: papilloedema, peripapillary atrophy, or outer retinal disease such as MEWDS and AZOOR.
Detecting progression
- Establish a baseline with two reliable fields, ideally close together.
- Event analysis (Guided Progression Analysis): deterioration at the same 3 or more points on 2 consecutive tests is flagged as "possible progression", and on 3 consecutive tests as "likely progression".
- Trend analysis: the slope of VFI or MD over time (e.g., %/year or dB/year) shows how fast the patient is losing vision and helps predict lifetime risk.
- Expert guidance (including the World Glaucoma Association) recommends frequent testing in the first two years, roughly 3 fields a year, to identify fast progressors early.
- Cataract and cataract surgery change MD. Reset the GPA baseline after surgery.
- Always interpret progression together with OCT, IOP history and the clinical picture. See our perimetry algorithms page.